International law: international disputes and civil procedure

This edited collection evaluates international and regional approaches to global governance problems, exploring solutions offered by the EU.

This book represents the first comprehensive analysis of NGO participation at international criminal and human rights courts.

Explores the contributions of international courts and tribunals in terms of performance by offering a comparative analysis of international courts.

Suggests that the Euro-crisis ought to be conceptualised as an inevitable symptom of the inherent systemic flaws of the EU.

Explores the relationship between the legitimacy, the efficacy, and the decision-making of national and transnational constitutional courts.

Explores how and why the rise in international courts impacts on domestic politics on both national and international levels.

This book analyses the most recent processes, laws and best practices for consumer dispute resolution and the law related to consumer redress.

An interdisciplinary volume exploring the concept of legitimacy in relation to international courts and what can drive and weaken it.

Explores judicial independence, integrity and impartiality in Asia-Pacific countries.

Evaluates the challenges and changes that the Belt and Road Initiative brings to China in international law and governance.

Investigates the relationship between international organizations and private subjects under the unexplored perspective of procurement by international organizations.

A study of state responsibility for acts committed in the course of different stages of adjudicatory process.

Looks at international negotiation from a novel, relational international law perspective and challenges prescriptive models.

The first comprehensive study of the distinction between justification and excuse under the international law of state responsibility.

Part essay, part novel, this book reveals how international courts produce their judgments and what invisible actors shape their decisions.

This book challenges Mancur Olson's famous observation that concentrated interests inevitably dominate diffuse ones in democracies by presenting an alternative view that strong, independent courts can effectively protect the rights of diffuse interests against powerful, concentrated groups.

This book challenges Mancur Olson's famous observation that concentrated interests inevitably dominate diffuse ones in democracies by presenting an alternative view that strong, independent courts can effectively protect the rights of diffuse interests against powerful, concentrated groups.