Judicial review

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy.

This book fills a gap in constitutional law by examining the global trend towards the substantive constitutional adjudication of electoral legislation.

An exploration of how and why the Constitution's plan for independent courts has failed to protect individuals' constitutional rights, while advancing regressive and reactionary barriers to progressive regulation.

This book offers the first quantitative study of decision-making on the UK Supreme Court.

Judicial Review, Third Edition covers the grounds for review, defences to an application, the remedies and procedures involved and covers the Rules of the Superior Courts 2011, SI 691/2011.

This unique collaboration between academics and practitioners explores the intersection of international commercial arbitration and the court systems.

A sitting justice reflects upon the authority of the Supreme Court-how that authority was gained and how measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it.

This is the second edition of Hart's leading book on the principle and practice of judicial review in Northern Ireland.

From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to utilitarian and retributive theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of law and an essential check on government power.

Verfassungsgerichtliche Institutionen- und Kompetenzprofile finden sich gegenwärtig in vielen politischen Gemeinwesen.

Here, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method of contrasting sketches of prominent legal figures responding to the constitutional crises of their day.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

As the Kadi-hype following the 2008 European Court of Justice judgment demonstrated, there are many problems associated with the judicial review of acts of international organizations.

This new history of the Christian Right considers how conservative evangelicals in the modern American South forged a political identity.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

The second volume in this series explores the evolution of administrative laws in Europe to better understand the foundations of EU institutions, focusing on the period of 1890-1910.

This book illuminates how law and politics interact in the judicial doctrines and explores how democracy sustains and is sustained by the exercise of judicial power.

Provides the first comparative look into executive decree authority.

A comparative, systematic and critical analysis of constitutional courts and constitutional review in Asia.

This book fills a gap in constitutional law by examining the global trend towards the substantive constitutional adjudication of electoral legislation.

Shows how judges work in a deliberative fashion with aligned political parties to re-interpret legal and constitutional text.

Develops a theory of the modern state based on trust, drawing on Law, History and Social Science.

The 3rd edition of this leading text provides a detailed account of the purposes of judicial review; the nature of the public-private divide in Northern Ireland law; the judicial review procedure; the grounds for review; and remedies.

This book considers how judicial review can be improved to strike the appropriate balance between legislative and judicial power.

In its six-decade history, the German Federal Constitutional Court has become one of the most powerful and influential constitutional tribunals in the world.

Who Judges?

Explores how courts vary the depth of scrutiny in judicial review and the virtues of different approaches.

Das Buch bietet eine Anleitung für verfassungsrechtliche Übungs- und Examensarbeiten anhand verschiedener Aufbauschemata zu den typischerweise in Prüfungen vorkommenden Verfahrensarten vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht.

Constitutional Statecraft in Asian Courts explores how courts engage in constitutional state-building in aspiring, yet deeply fragile, democracies in Asia.

Judgement Calls tackles one of the most important and controversial legal questions in contemporary America: How should judges interpret the Constitution?

Covering all of the substantive grounds on which a claim may be brought, this definitive new work provides unrivalled analysis and guidance on the law of judicial review.

Judgement Calls tackles one of the most important and controversial legal questions in contemporary America: How should judges interpret the Constitution?

Covering all of the substantive grounds on which a claim may be brought, this definitive new work provides unrivalled analysis and guidance on the law of judicial review.

In this book Dimitrios Kyritsis advances an original account of constitutional review of primary legislation for its compatibility with human rights.

Constitutional Statecraft in Asian Courts explores how courts engage in constitutional state-building in aspiring, yet deeply fragile, democracies in Asia.