Judicial review

In this book Dimitrios Kyritsis advances an original account of constitutional review of primary legislation for its compatibility with human rights.

EU law applies in a significant range of areas where public bodies take decisions that are susceptible to judicial review and it is an increasingly important element of the treatment of powers and remedies in public law.

The second volume in this series explores the evolution of administrative laws in Europe to better understand the foundations of EU institutions, focusing on the period of 1890-1910.

This is the second edition of Hart's leading book on the principle and practice of judicial review in Northern Ireland.

In its six-decade history, the German Federal Constitutional Court has become one of the most powerful and influential constitutional tribunals in the world.

Explores the relationship between the legitimacy, the efficacy, and the decision-making of national and transnational constitutional courts.

Judicial Review, Third Edition covers the grounds for review, defences to an application, the remedies and procedures involved and covers the Rules of the Superior Courts 2011, SI 691/2011.

From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to utilitarian and retributive theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of law and an essential check on government power.

EU law applies in a significant range of areas where public bodies take decisions that are susceptible to judicial review and it is an increasingly important element of the treatment of powers and remedies in public law.

This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.

In this book, Peter J.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy.

Multiplication des affaires, explosion des contentieux, procès retentissants qui tiennent en alerte l'opinion : autant de manifestations d'une montée en puissance de la justice, dont on attend qu'elle soit à la fois l'arbitre des moeurs, le garant de la moralité publique et le responsable du salut des personnes.

Contemporary democracies have granted an expansive amount of power to unelected judges that sit in constitutional or supreme courts.

Argues that legislatures are necessary for securing human rights, and opposes theories that locate that responsibility primarily with courts.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

In a comprehensive examination of the constitutional systems of Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Singapore, Po Jen Yap contributes to a field that has traditionally focussed on Western jurisdictions.

Uses the EU Treaty framework to (re)assess the legitimacy of the Court of Justice''s institutional role in European integration.

This book considers how judicial review can be improved to strike the appropriate balance between legislative and judicial power.

Contemporary democracies have granted an expansive amount of power to unelected judges that sit in constitutional or supreme courts.

This book is a non-fiction, painfully true account of an American whistle blower whose silencing was attempted by conflicted and vengeful bureaucrats.

Now a New York Times Best Seller and a National Book Award finalist.

Lee Bollinger is one of our foremost experts on the First Amendment--both an erudite scholar and elegant advocate.

"Manuel simplifié de logique adaptée au droit" offre une exploration approfondie des techniques essentielles qui régissent le raisonnement juridique.

From 1953 to 1969, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren brought about many of the proudest achievements of American constitutional law.

From 1953 to 1969, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren brought about many of the proudest achievements of American constitutional law.

An exploration of how and why the Constitution's plan for independent courts has failed to protect individuals' constitutional rights, while advancing regressive and reactionary barriers to progressive regulation.

An exploration of how and why the Constitution's plan for independent courts has failed to protect individuals' constitutional rights, while advancing regressive and reactionary barriers to progressive regulation.

At some point, everyone living in the United States has some type of interaction with the American judicial system.

At some point, everyone living in the United States has some type of interaction with the American judicial system.

Develops a theory of the modern state based on trust, drawing on Law, History and Social Science.

In June 2015, the Supreme Court declared that marriage violates the United States Constitution.

Since the 1990 wave of constitutional reforms in Africa, the role of constitutional courts or courts exercising the power to interpret and apply constitutions have become a critical aspect to the on-going process of constitutional construction, reconstruction, and maintenance.