Judicial review

What a conservative Supreme Court is doing with its powerFrom 2011, when Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives, until the pandemic made inaction untenable, Congress enacted hardly any major legislation outside of the tax law President Trump signed in 2017.

In this book, Peter J.

The Credentialed Court starts by establishing just how different todays Justices are from their predecessors.

The government has no power greater than to take away a person's freedom or even life.

Now a New York Times Best Seller and a National Book Award finalist.

This important new book penetrates that veil of secrecy with thirteen interviews tape recorded in the chambers of the respective judges.

To effect just outcomes the justice system requires that law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and judges be committed-above all-to doing justice.

In June 2015, the Supreme Court declared that marriage violates the United States Constitution.

The "e;rule of law"e; stands at the heart of the American legal system.

This book is a non-fiction, painfully true account of an American whistle blower whose silencing was attempted by conflicted and vengeful bureaucrats.

Develops a theory of the modern state based on trust, drawing on Law, History and Social Science.

Explores the relationship between the legitimacy, the efficacy, and the decision-making of national and transnational constitutional courts.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

Discusses Upendra Baxi''s role as an Indian jurist and how his contributions have shaped our understanding of legal jurisprudence.

Provides the first comparative look into executive decree authority.

Shows how judges work in a deliberative fashion with aligned political parties to re-interpret legal and constitutional text.

Uses the EU Treaty framework to (re)assess the legitimacy of the Court of Justice''s institutional role in European integration.

Argues that legislatures are necessary for securing human rights, and opposes theories that locate that responsibility primarily with courts.

Develops a theory of the modern state based on trust, drawing on Law, History and Social Science.

Shows how judges work in a deliberative fashion with aligned political parties to re-interpret legal and constitutional text.

A comparative, systematic and critical analysis of constitutional courts and constitutional review in Asia.

Who Judges?

This new history of the Christian Right considers how conservative evangelicals in the modern American South forged a political identity.

This new history of the Christian Right considers how conservative evangelicals in the modern American South forged a political identity.

This book illuminates how law and politics interact in the judicial doctrines and explores how democracy sustains and is sustained by the exercise of judicial power.

This book illuminates how law and politics interact in the judicial doctrines and explores how democracy sustains and is sustained by the exercise of judicial power.

Explores how courts vary the depth of scrutiny in judicial review and the virtues of different approaches.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy.

A sitting justice reflects upon the authority of the Supreme Court-how that authority was gained and how measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it.

This book considers how judicial review can be improved to strike the appropriate balance between legislative and judicial power.

Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine Justices who voted in Roe v.

In its six-decade history, the German Federal Constitutional Court has become one of the most powerful and influential constitutional tribunals in the world.

In its six-decade history, the German Federal Constitutional Court has become one of the most powerful and influential constitutional tribunals in the world.

From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to utilitarian and retributive theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of law and an essential check on government power.

Here, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method of contrasting sketches of prominent legal figures responding to the constitutional crises of their day.

Here, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method of contrasting sketches of prominent legal figures responding to the constitutional crises of their day.

Lee Bollinger is one of our foremost experts on the First Amendment--both an erudite scholar and elegant advocate.

Lee Bollinger is one of our foremost experts on the First Amendment--both an erudite scholar and elegant advocate.

From the ancient origins of Just War doctrine to utilitarian and retributive theories of punishment, concepts of proportionality have long been an instrumental part of the rule of law and an essential check on government power.

Judgement Calls tackles one of the most important and controversial legal questions in contemporary America: How should judges interpret the Constitution?

An exploration of how and why the Constitution's plan for independent courts has failed to protect individuals' constitutional rights, while advancing regressive and reactionary barriers to progressive regulation.

An exploration of how and why the Constitution's plan for independent courts has failed to protect individuals' constitutional rights, while advancing regressive and reactionary barriers to progressive regulation.

This book offers the first quantitative study of decision-making on the UK Supreme Court.

This book offers the first quantitative study of decision-making on the UK Supreme Court.

The third wave of democracy that reached African shores at the end of the Cold War brought with it a dramatic decline from 1990 onwards in dictatorships, military regimes, one-party governments, and presidents for life.

The second volume in this series explores the evolution of administrative laws in Europe to better understand the foundations of EU institutions, focusing on the period of 1890-1910.

The second volume in this series explores the evolution of administrative laws in Europe to better understand the foundations of EU institutions, focusing on the period of 1890-1910.

Since the 1990 wave of constitutional reforms in Africa, the role of constitutional courts or courts exercising the power to interpret and apply constitutions have become a critical aspect to the on-going process of constitutional construction, reconstruction, and maintenance.