Judicial review

Multiplication des affaires, explosion des contentieux, procès retentissants qui tiennent en alerte l'opinion : autant de manifestations d'une montée en puissance de la justice, dont on attend qu'elle soit à la fois l'arbitre des moeurs, le garant de la moralité publique et le responsable du salut des personnes.

À l’heure où même des parlementaires désignent les prisons comme une « honte pour la République », nos sociétés qui se veulent évoluées s’efforcent de donner un « sens » à la peine.

We are confronted with a jarring reality that the Left has succeeded in growing the power of the courts.

This is the second edition of Hart's leading book on the principle and practice of judicial review in Northern Ireland.

This is the second edition of Hart's leading book on the principle and practice of judicial review in Northern Ireland.

What a conservative Supreme Court is doing with its powerFrom 2011, when Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives, until the pandemic made inaction untenable, Congress enacted hardly any major legislation outside of the tax law President Trump signed in 2017.

In this book, Peter J.

The Credentialed Court starts by establishing just how different todays Justices are from their predecessors.

The government has no power greater than to take away a person's freedom or even life.

Now a New York Times Best Seller and a National Book Award finalist.

This important new book penetrates that veil of secrecy with thirteen interviews tape recorded in the chambers of the respective judges.

To effect just outcomes the justice system requires that law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and judges be committed-above all-to doing justice.

Judicial Review, Third Edition covers the grounds for review, defences to an application, the remedies and procedures involved and covers the Rules of the Superior Courts 2011, SI 691/2011.

Judicial Review, Third Edition covers the grounds for review, defences to an application, the remedies and procedures involved and covers the Rules of the Superior Courts 2011, SI 691/2011.

In June 2015, the Supreme Court declared that marriage violates the United States Constitution.

The "e;rule of law"e; stands at the heart of the American legal system.

This book is a non-fiction, painfully true account of an American whistle blower whose silencing was attempted by conflicted and vengeful bureaucrats.

Develops a theory of the modern state based on trust, drawing on Law, History and Social Science.

Explores the relationship between the legitimacy, the efficacy, and the decision-making of national and transnational constitutional courts.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

Comparing five Central American countries, this book explores the influences of criminals, activists, and other societal actors on the justice system.

Discusses Upendra Baxi''s role as an Indian jurist and how his contributions have shaped our understanding of legal jurisprudence.

Provides the first comparative look into executive decree authority.

Shows how judges work in a deliberative fashion with aligned political parties to re-interpret legal and constitutional text.

Uses the EU Treaty framework to (re)assess the legitimacy of the Court of Justice''s institutional role in European integration.

Argues that legislatures are necessary for securing human rights, and opposes theories that locate that responsibility primarily with courts.

Develops a theory of the modern state based on trust, drawing on Law, History and Social Science.

Shows how judges work in a deliberative fashion with aligned political parties to re-interpret legal and constitutional text.

A comparative, systematic and critical analysis of constitutional courts and constitutional review in Asia.

Who Judges?

This new history of the Christian Right considers how conservative evangelicals in the modern American South forged a political identity.

This new history of the Christian Right considers how conservative evangelicals in the modern American South forged a political identity.

This book illuminates how law and politics interact in the judicial doctrines and explores how democracy sustains and is sustained by the exercise of judicial power.

This book illuminates how law and politics interact in the judicial doctrines and explores how democracy sustains and is sustained by the exercise of judicial power.

Explores how courts vary the depth of scrutiny in judicial review and the virtues of different approaches.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Marshall case asserted sweeping Native treaty rights and generated intense controversy.

A sitting justice reflects upon the authority of the Supreme Court-how that authority was gained and how measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it.

This book considers how judicial review can be improved to strike the appropriate balance between legislative and judicial power.

Based on 20 years of research, including an examination of the papers of eight of the nine Justices who voted in Roe v.